(April 1, 2010 - June 30, 2010)
In cases where MSDE has been informed that a hearing decision is being appealed in accordance with Section 615(i) of IDEA 2004, an asterisk (*) is placed next to the OAH Case #. The civil or district court number of the case is provided when available.
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Anne Arundel County Public Schools |
10-H-AARU-09602 |
6/16/2010 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Development/Review/Revision, Placement/LRE/complainant requesting less restrictive |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ found that the parent did not meet the burden of proof and dismissed the case. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Baltimore County Public Schools |
10-H-BCNY-16417 |
6/17/2010 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Development/Review/Revision |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ found that the parent did not meet the burden of proof and dismissed the case. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County Public Schools |
09-H-MONT-33963 |
4/5/2010 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Development/Review/Revision, Tuition Reimbursement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded the MCPS proposed IEP is appropriate, therefore, denied the parent's request for tuition reimbursement. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County Public Schools |
09-H-MONT-40388 |
6/9/2010 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Development/Review/Revision, Tuition Reimbursement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded the MCPS IEP was not appropriate, therefore, granted the parent's request for tuition reimbursement. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County Public Schools |
09-H-MONT-41647 |
4/5/2010 |
Public Agency |
IEP Development/Review/Revision, Tuition Reimbursement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded the MCPS proposed IEP is appropriate, therefore, denied the parent's request for tuition reimbursement. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County Public Schools |
09-H-MONT-46034 |
5/25/2010 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Implementation-Placement, Placement Determination |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that although the IEP was not implemented as written, the failure did not deny the student FAPE. Further, the ALJ denied the parent's request that the student be transferred to another school because it was not an IDEA issue. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County Public Schools |
10-H-MONT-12286 |
5/21/2010 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Development/Review/Revision, Placement/LRE/complainant requesting more restrictive |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded the parents failed to meet their burden of proof, therefore, denied the parents request for more restrictive placement. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County Public Schools |
10-H-MONT-14099 |
6/18/2010 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Development/Review/Revision |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the student did not require speech/language services in order to be provided with FAPE. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Prince George's County Public Schools |
10-H-PGEO-03436 |
4/28/2010 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Development/Review/Revision, Identification/Evaluation/Reevaluation -Part B |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that PGCPS did not complete the initial evaluation within timelines and that the IEP in effect during the first half of the school year was not reasonably calculated to provide the student with FAPE. However, the ALJ further concluded that the parent failed to request, or prove the need for, any remedies to which the student would be entitled as the result of the procedural violations identified, and therefore, the ALJ dismissed the case. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Prince George's County Public Schools |
10-H-PGEO-03535 |
5/13/2010 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Development/Review/Revision, Placement/LRE/complainant requesting more restrictive |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded the IEP and placement are appropriate, therefore, denied the parent's request for residential placement. |
|
|
|
|
Maryland State Department of Education
Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services |
| 200 West Baltimore Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|