(October 1, 2011 - December 31, 2011)
In cases where MSDE has been informed that a hearing decision is being appealed in accordance with Section 615(i) of IDEA 2004, an asterisk (*) is placed next to the OAH Case #. The civil or district court number of the case is provided when available.
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Howard County Public Schools |
11-H-HOWD-34436 |
11/22/2011 |
Parent/Guardian |
Compensatory Services, Identification/Evaluation/Reevaluation-Part B, IEP Implementation-Placement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that during the 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 school years, the school system developed an IEP that would have provided the student with a FAPE had the parents’ not unilaterally placed the student in a nonpublic school. The ALJ further concluded that the school system also included the parents as “equal participating members” of the IEP team and as a result of these determinations, the ALJ denied the parents’ request for tuition reimbursement. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County
Public Schools |
11-H-MONT-24917 |
12/21/2011 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Implementation-Placement, Tuition Reimbursement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the IEP and placement proposed by the school system was reasonably calculated to offer the student a FAPE. As a result of this determination, the ALJ denied the parents’ request for nonpublic tuition reimbursement. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County
Public Schools |
11-H-MONT-28522 |
10/19/2011 |
Parent/Guardian |
Identification/Evaluation/Placement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that IEP proposed by the school system was reasonably calculated to offer the student a FAPE and therefore, the ALJ denied the parent's request for a nonpublic placement for the 2011-2012 school year. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County
Public Schools |
11-H-MONT-28930 |
11/30/2011 |
Parent/Guardian |
IEP Implementation-accommodations, aids & services, modifications, Nonpublic Placement/Tuition Reimbursement |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that IEP proposed by the school system was reasonably calculated to offer the student a FAPE and therefore, the ALJ denied the parent's request for nonpublic tuition reimbursement for the second half of the 2010-2011 school year and the first half of the 2011-2012 school year. The ALJ also denied the parent's request for a nonpublic placement for the remainder of the 2011-2012 school year. |
| Public Agency |
OAH Case #
______________ |
Decision Date |
Hearing Requested By |
Issues |
|
Montgomery County
Public Schools |
11-H-MONT-31129 |
10/11/2011 |
Parent/Guardian |
Placement/LRE/FAPE |
Decision Summary
____________ |
The ALJ concluded that the student's placement that was proposed by the school system for the 2011-2012 school year was the least restrictive environment in which the IEP could be implemented inorder to provide the student with a FAPE. As a result, the ALJ denied the parent’s request for change in placement. |
|
|
|
|
Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services
Maryland State Department of Education |
| 200 West Baltimore Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|